ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
A competing risk-based prognostic model for cancer-specific survival in non-metastatic head and neck adenoid cystic carcinoma.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Traditional Cox regression may yield biased estimates when competing events are present, limiting the accuracy of prognostic analyses in head and neck adenoid cystic carcinoma (HNACC). This study applied the Fine-Gray competing risks model to identify independent prognostic factors associated with HNACC-related mortality and develop a predictive nomogram using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Methods: Patients diagnosed with HNACC between 2004 and 2015 were identified from the SEER database. Univariable analyses were performed using Gray's test and the cumulative incidence function, while multivariable analyses employed Cox regression and Fine-Gray proportional subdistribution hazards models. A nomogram was developed to predict 3-, 5-, and 10-year cancer-specific survival (CSS) and validated in an independent cohort. Results: A total of 2,688 eligible patients were included. During follow-up, 1,046 deaths occurred, of which 673 were attributable to HNACC. The Fine-Gray model identified age, T-stage, N-stage, POCRT status, PORT status, and perineural invasion (PNI) as independent prognostic factors for CSS. These variables were incorporated into a nomogram that demonstrated excellent discrimination, with concordance indices of 0.818, 0.806, and 0.822 for 3-, 5-, and 10-year predictions in the training cohort, and 0.909, 0.931, and 0.965, respectively, in the validation cohort. Conclusions: The competing risks model identified key prognostic factors influencing CSS in HNACC. The derived nomogram provides individualized survival estimates, offering a practical tool to support clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.