ArticleRisk management and healthcare policy2026
Risk Assessment of Emergency Medical Resource Exhaustion Under Major Infectious Disease Outbreaks: Based on Discrete-Event Simulation Models.
Article in Risk management and healthcare policy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To quantify the risk of emergency medical resource exhaustion during the early stages of major infectious disease outbreaks and proposed resource allocation optimization strategies. Methods: This study integrated discrete event simulation and patient flow theory to develop a dynamic medical resource allocation simulation system in Hubei Province from January 23 to February 21, 2020. This period referred to the first 30 days interval following the implementation of the lockdown in Wuhan. The system simulated the utilization of general hospital beds, ICU beds, and ventilators under three distinct resource supply scenarios: baseline (Expected), optimal (Best case), and worst (Worst case). Simulation outputs including cumulative depletion days, waiting time, and deaths attributable to delayed access to critical resources were summarized using descriptive statistical analysis. Results: In the Best case scenario, the cumulative depletion days of ICU beds and ventilators persisted for 4 days and 6 days respectively, while no shortages occurred for general beds; 384 deaths were attributable to waiting for resources. In the Expected scenario, the cumulative depletion days of ICU beds, ventilators, and general beds were 11 days, 17 days, and 1 day respectively, with 766 deaths attributable to waiting for resources. In the Worst case scenario, the cumulative depletion days of both ICU beds and ventilators were 28 days, and general beds also experienced severe congestion resulting in an average wait time of 4.18 days, a maximum wait time of 11.28 days, and with 15,029 deaths attributable to waiting for resources. Conclusion: The abrupt surge in cases at the onset of the epidemic exerted considerable pressure on medical resources. The intensity of resource supply is highly correlated with the risk of patient death, and ventilators and ICU beds are the key resources affecting the death risk. This simulation model can provide a scientific tool for emergency resource reserve and allocation in public health emergencies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.