ArticleJournal of medical education and curricular development
Integrating Quiz-Based Self-Assessment Into a Microbiology Practical Course: Effects on Student Perception and Learning Outcomes.
Article in Journal of medical education and curricular development. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Practical courses in medical microbiology aim to translate theory into hands-on skills, but students often struggle to link laboratory techniques with diagnostic procedures. Formative testing and self-assessment enhance knowledge retention and metacognitive awareness. This study aims to integrate quiz-based self-assessment using an audience response system (OnlineTED) into a microbiological practical course to evaluate feasibility and explore whether quiz-based self-assessment is associated with differences in students' perceived learning outcomes, satisfaction, and engagement. Methods: Medical students ( Results: Overall evaluations were very high in both groups. No statistically significant differences were observed between groups, likely reflecting a ceiling effect. Descriptive differences in the distribution of top ratings were observed in favor of the quiz cohort: more students awarded the top rating for clarity of learning objectives (57.9% vs 28.6%), relevance for the final exam (63.2% vs 38.1%), and learning outcome (68.4% vs 42.9%). In the quiz cohort, aggregated quiz accuracy increased from 63.6% on day 1 to 88.8% on day 6. Similarly, mean examination scores were descriptively higher in the quiz cohort and increased from 6.65 to 7.10 points, while the exam failure rate declined in the quiz group (15.87% vs 11.29%). Day-specific evaluations indicated variation in perceived success and sufficiency of time, highlighting sessions requiring adjustment. Conclusion: Integrating interactive quizzes was feasible, well accepted, might enhanced students perceived learning goals and provided valuable feedback for supervisors without increasing workload or reducing satisfaction. As structured evaluations, quizzes can guide targeted curriculum adjustments and optimization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.