ArticleJournal of medical education and curricular development
Objectification, Desensitization, and Personification: Medical Student Strategies for Engaging with Donor Bodies in the Anatomy Lab.
Article in Journal of medical education and curricular development. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessing changes in academic motivation across medical training stages: a longitudinal study in Malaysia.Annals of medicine · 2026Article
- Scalpels and Standards: What Students Consider Ethical, Unethical, and Ethically Challenging in the Anatomy Lab.Medical science educator · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Human dissection remains a cornerstone of anatomy education, providing students with an early and profound encounter with the dead. Beyond technical skill acquisition, students must navigate the challenge of engaging with donor bodies in ways that are respectful, professional, and emotionally sustainable. Given the formative role of dissection in professional identity formation, this study explored the strategies students adopt in interacting with donor bodies and the motivations guiding these choices. Methods: All medical students (M1-M4) at a single institution were invited to participate, and recruitment was closed after 44 students volunteered for either an interview or focus group. Of these, 24 joined focus groups and 20 completed individual semi-structured interviews. Sessions were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and thematically analyzed using inductive coding. Results: Analysis revealed four main strategies employed by students: (1) complete objectification of the donor as a non-living entity; (2) active desensitization to facilitate dissection; (3) overwhelming personification that impeded both learning and technical performance; and (4) middle-ground approaches involving oscillation between desensitization and personification. Conclusion: These findings highlight the diversity of strategies medical students use to engage with donor bodies in the anatomy lab and underscore the importance of recognizing and supporting this variation to foster ethical, compassionate learning environments and professional identity formation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.