Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Validation of the French-Language "Barriers to Nurses' Use of Physical Assessment Scale".

Filipa Pereira, Lorena Da Veiga Gonçalves, Ricardo Salgado, Catherine Bolduc, Henk Verloo

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in SAGE open nursing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Filipa PereiraSchool of Health Sciences, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland HES-SO Valais/Wallis, Sion, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9207-4856

Lorena Da Veiga GonçalvesSchool of Health Sciences of the Canton of Vaud, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0647-8403

Ricardo SalgadoLa Source School of Nursing, HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8287-7361

Catherine BolducNursing Department, Valais Romand Hospital Centre, Sion, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-1781-1668

Henk VerlooSchool of Health Sciences, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland HES-SO Valais/Wallis, Sion, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5375-3255

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Physical assessment is a fundamental component of nursing practice, yet various barriers can limit its use in clinical settings. Objectives: To evaluate the construct validity and reliability of a culturally adapted, French-language version of the Methods: We conducted a cultural adaptation and validation study, using secondary data analysis. Data were collected using three cross-sectional surveys conducted among nurses working in surgical, geriatrics and rehabilitation units in French-speaking Switzerland ( Results: The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin sampling adequacy value was 0.848, and Bartlett's test of sphericity was significant ( Conclusion: The French-language version of the Patient or Public Contribution: This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct, or reporting.

Indexed as

barriersFrench versionnursing physical assessmentreliabilityscalevalidity

Identifiers

PMID41948432

DOI10.1177/23779608261431639

PMCPMC13051132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY-NC

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.