ArticleBMJ open sport & exercise medicine2026
Perceptions of concussion management and testing among healthcare professionals in rugby union: a qualitative analysis.
Article in BMJ open sport & exercise medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Preliminary Evaluation of the Circle Sequencing Task (CST) as a Cognitive-Motor Tool for Concussion Assessment.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite ongoing developments in head injury protocols, rugby union still faces challenges in achieving accurate, rapid and context-appropriate concussion assessment on-field and at pitch-side, with clinicians often required to make complex decisions using tools that remain imperfect. The purpose of this research is to gain insight into the perceptions and experiences of high-level rugby union healthcare professionals (HCPs) on current head injury assessment protocols. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with eight HCPs working in rugby union. Following a six-stage, inductive, reflexive thematic analysis, five key themes emerged. Findings reveal that while standardised protocols offer structure to an assessment, clinical judgement remains central to effective diagnosis. Participants expressed cautious optimism towards emerging technologies, including biomarker testing and motor control assessments. This study offers practitioner-informed insights into the nuanced realities of concussion assessment. Furthermore, this work underscores the need for future tools to be evidence-based and adaptable to the real-world context of elite sport.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.