Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41948422›Full record

ArticleBMJ open sport & exercise medicine2026

Perceptions of concussion management and testing among healthcare professionals in rugby union: a qualitative analysis.

Jac Lloyd Palmer, Ryan Baker, Amber Regardsoe, Gareth Irwin, Genevieve Williams

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open sport & exercise medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jac Lloyd PalmerPublic Health and Sport Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-0124-2699
Ryan BakerPublic Health and Sport Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Amber RegardsoeCardiff School of Sport and Health Sciences, Cardiff Metropolitan University, Cardiff, Wales, UK.
Gareth IrwinCardiff School of Sport and Health Sciences, Cardiff Metropolitan University, Cardiff, Wales, UK.
Genevieve WilliamsPublic Health and Sport Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1707-8245

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite ongoing developments in head injury protocols, rugby union still faces challenges in achieving accurate, rapid and context-appropriate concussion assessment on-field and at pitch-side, with clinicians often required to make complex decisions using tools that remain imperfect. The purpose of this research is to gain insight into the perceptions and experiences of high-level rugby union healthcare professionals (HCPs) on current head injury assessment protocols. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with eight HCPs working in rugby union. Following a six-stage, inductive, reflexive thematic analysis, five key themes emerged. Findings reveal that while standardised protocols offer structure to an assessment, clinical judgement remains central to effective diagnosis. Participants expressed cautious optimism towards emerging technologies, including biomarker testing and motor control assessments. This study offers practitioner-informed insights into the nuanced realities of concussion assessment. Furthermore, this work underscores the need for future tools to be evidence-based and adaptable to the real-world context of elite sport.

Indexed as

ConcussionQualitative ResearchRugbySports & exercise medicine

Identifiers

PMID41948422
PMCPMC13052733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.