ArticleClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR2026
Real-World Progression-Free Survival and Healthcare Resource Utilization Associated with Daratumumab Use in Transplant-Ineligible Multiple Myeloma Patients in Italy.
Article in ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study evaluated real-world clinical and economic outcomes associated with daratumumab-based regimens in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) ineligible for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in Italy. Differences in healthcare resource use according to daratumumab administration route (intravenous vs subcutaneous) were also explored. Methods: A retrospective observational analysis was conducted using administrative healthcare databases from Italian Local Health Units covering ~12 million individuals (2018-2023). Patients with MM receiving daratumumab in first-line (1L) or second-line (2L) therapy were included. Real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS), defined as time to treatment switch or death, was used as a proxy endpoint for disease progression, and healthcare resource utilization were compared between treatment regimens. Propensity score weighting was applied to to improve comparability between treatment groups. Direct healthcare costs captured in administrative databases were analyzed from the perspective of the Italian National Health System. Results: Among 790 non-ASCT MM patients, 344 received 1L DaraRd and 413 received 2L DaraRd. In the 1L setting, median rwPFS was not reached for DaraRd and was 25.7 months for Rd (p=0.011). In 2L, median rwPFS was 42.9 months for DaraRd versus 19.1 months for Rd (p <0.001). In 1L, DaraRd was associated with lower hospitalization costs compared with Rd for both all-cause (€4324 vs €7971) and MM-related (€2862 vs €6693) admissions. In 2L, differences in hospitalization costs were smaller and not statistically significant. Conclusion: In this real-world analysis, daratumumab-based regimens were associated with longer rwPFS compared with Rd among transplant-ineligible MM patients, in both 1L and 2 L settings. In 1L treatment, these outcomes were accompanied by lower hospitalization costs. Given the retrospective design and the use of administrative healthcare data, these findings should be interpreted with caution, but they contribute to the growing body of real-world evidence on treatment outcomes and resource utilization in routine clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.