Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41948306›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of biomaterials2026

Barriers Implementing Patient-Specific 3D-Printed Bone Scaffolds in Australia: A Scoping Review.

Anthony Vidler, Angus Hayes

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of biomaterials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Anthony VidlerSchool of Rural Medicine, Charles Sturt University, Orange, New South Wales, Australia, csu.edu.au.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-2962-7524
Angus HayesSchool of Rural Medicine, Charles Sturt University, Orange, New South Wales, Australia, csu.edu.au.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-8764-0504

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

3D printing has emerged as an innovative technology over the last decade, with widespread uptake in several fields spanning science, technology and engineering; however, penetration into medical markets has been met with a variety of obstacles. At the 17

Indexed as

additive manufacturingbioprintingimplantable devicesorthopaedicsthree-dimensionaltissue scaffolds

Identifiers

PMID41948306
PMCPMC13051841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.