Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41948280›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2026

Professional perspectives on PN among registered dietitians in Saudi Arabia: a mixed-methods assessment.

Yasmin Algindan, Hoda AboAlsamh, Shabir Ahmad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yasmin AlgindanDepartment of Clinical Nutrition, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Imam Abdulrahman bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.
Hoda AboAlsamhCollege of Business Administration, Imam Abdulrahman bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.
Shabir AhmadCollege of Business, Al Yamamah University, Al Khobar, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The clinical implementation of personalized nutrition (PN) remains limited, despite growing interest. Healthcare professionals' readiness for adoption must be better understood. Objective: The aim of this study is to explore registered dietitians' perceptions, attitudes, and readiness regarding PN and multi-omics approaches in Saudi Arabia. Method: A mixed-methods survey of 88 registered dietitians in Saudi Arabia provided quantitative and qualitative data on personalized nutrition technology (PNT) adoption patterns and barriers, analysed using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to identify implementation barriers and facilitators. Results: PNT adoption was low (16%). Work experience, but not education level, had a relatively greater correlation with perceived usefulness of PNT ( Conclusion: While Saudi dietitians have positive attitudes toward PN, they face significant implementation barriers at both an organizational and educational levels. For PN integration to be achieved within the Kingdom's healthcare system, policy, academic, and institutional interventions are required to enhance organizational support, professional training gaps, and interprofessional collaboration frameworks.

Indexed as

multi-omicsomics-technologypersonalized nutritionPNregistered dietitiansSaudi Arabia

Identifiers

PMID41948280
PMCPMC13050749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.