Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41948267›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

A Brief Overview of Antenatal Care Services at Two Primary Care Centers in Bangladesh.

Md Saifur Rahman, Mir Susmita Zaman, Mirza Md Asaduzzaman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Md Saifur RahmanObstetrics and Gynecology, Bhola 250 Bed District Sadar Hospital, Bhola, BGD.
Mir Susmita ZamanPublic Health, Pi Research and Development Center, Dhaka, BGD.
Mirza Md AsaduzzamanGynecological Oncology, National Institute of Cancer Research and Hospital, Dhaka, BGD.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe health and well-being of mothers and their fetuses depend on the timely utilization of antenatal care (ANC) and delivery services. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the current situation of ANC services at primary care centers in Bangladesh.

methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted at two primary healthcare centers in Bangladesh over a six-month period. A total of 359 childbearing women who visited for ANC services were interviewed using a semistructured questionnaire. ANC service utilization was assessed in terms of the number of ANC visits, presence of health personnel, availability of iron tablets and folic acid, informing danger signs, and number of tetanus toxoid (TT) vaccinations, along with the overall satisfaction of participants during service utilization.

resultsThe majority of participants were between 21 and 25 years old (37.6%), lived in semiurban (municipal area) areas (49.3%), and had completed at least secondary school (52.4%). Thirty-five percent of women were primigravid. Among participants, 55.7% had their first ANC visit. Only 45.1% women had completed the TT vaccination before the visit. Advice on family planning (72.4%) and eating nutritious food during pregnancy (82.5%) was received. Iron and folic acid tablets were accessible to 94.7% of the patients. During the ANC visit, privacy was maintained (96.4%), danger signs were addressed (83.6%), and the behaviors of healthcare providers were rated as very good (47.1%) or good (50.4%). Overall satisfaction with services was reported by 81.6% of participants.

conclusionThe high level of participant satisfaction reflects the overall positive quality of primary health care services.

Indexed as

anc qualityantenatal care utilizationhealthcare accessibilityhealth infrastructurematernal healthcare

Identifiers

PMID41948267
PMCPMC13050798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.