ArticleCureus2026
Improving Compliance With the World Health Organization Surgical Safety Checklist Through a Clinical Audit at Prince Osman Digna Hospital, Sudan.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and aim The World Health Organization (WHO) Surgical Safety Checklist (SSC) is widely used to support safe perioperative practice; however, achieving consistent and complete use in routine clinical settings remains challenging, particularly in resource-limited environments. Quality improvement audits provide a structured approach for evaluating current practice, identifying gaps, and supporting improvements in perioperative processes and team communication. This study aimed to assess baseline compliance with the WHO SSC and evaluate the impact of targeted interventions on checklist adherence at Prince Osman Digna Hospital, Sudan. Methods A closed-loop clinical audit was conducted between March and August 2025. The first cycle involved a retrospective review of all surgical cases (n = 101) performed over a two-week period, representing total coverage of eligible procedures. This was followed by a two-month intervention comprising staff education, standardized checklist documentation, and regular feedback. A second prospective audit cycle assessed all consecutive surgical cases (n = 203) performed over a three-month period, again using total coverage sampling. Compliance with SSC components across the Sign In, Time Out, and Sign Out phases was compared between cycles. Results Baseline compliance varied widely, with particularly low adherence in communication-dependent checklist items. In the first cycle, team introductions were documented in 22 (21.8%) cases, discussion of anticipated critical steps in 18 (17.8%), and completion of surgical counts in 41 (40.6%). Following the intervention, substantial improvements were observed across most parameters, including team introductions (86 (42.4%) vs. 22 (21.8%), p < 0.001), discussion of anticipated critical steps (66 (32.5%) vs. 18 (17.8%), p = 0.006), surgical counts (132 (65.0%) vs. 41 (40.6%), p < 0.001), specimen labeling (96 (47.3%) vs. 28 (27.7%), p = 0.001), and nursing sterility confirmation (184 (90.6%) vs. 25 (24.8%), p < 0.001). Several domains demonstrated large absolute improvements, while a few items, such as surgical site marking (161 (79.3%) vs. 83 (82.2%), p = 0.554), showed minimal change. Conclusions Targeted, low-cost audit interventions significantly improved adherence to the WHO SSC and strengthened perioperative communication. This project demonstrates that audit-driven strategies can effectively enhance surgical safety practices in resource-limited settings and provides a scalable model for ongoing quality improvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.