ReviewCureus2026
Efficacy of Dupilumab in Treating Trachyonychia and Other Nail Dystrophies: A Systematic Review of Case Reports.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Trachyonychia and related nail dystrophies are often associated with inflammatory skin diseases such as atopic dermatitis, psoriasis, and alopecia areata. Management remains difficult, as standard therapies frequently yield limited benefit. Dupilumab, an IL-4Rα antagonist, is effective for Th2-driven conditions, but its role in nail dystrophies has not been systematically assessed. This review evaluates the existing evidence on dupilumab for trachyonychia and related nail disorders. A systematic search of PubMed, Wiley, Web of Science, MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and EBSCO was performed from inception to July 2025 with a string of specified keywords. Studies reporting patients with nail dystrophy treated with dupilumab were included. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed study quality using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Case Reports. Eight case reports met the inclusion criteria. Trachyonychia, twenty-nail dystrophy, median canaliform dystrophy, and mixed onychodystrophies were represented. All reports described clinical improvement, with several achieving near-complete recovery. Time to improvement ranged from weeks to over a year, with pediatric patients often responding faster. Dupilumab was well tolerated, with no serious adverse effects reported. Concurrent therapies limited the attribution of outcomes solely to dupilumab. Current evidence suggests dupilumab may improve nail dystrophies associated with Th2-mediated disease. However, evidence remains limited to isolated case reports. Larger controlled studies using standardized nail outcome measures are needed to confirm efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.