ArticleCase reports in urology2026
Mitomycin Gel for the Pyelocaliceal System in Patients With Urinary Diversion: First Reported Cases and Operative Technique.
Article in Case reports in urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mitomycin Gel for the Pyelocaliceal System in Patients With Urinary Diversion: First Reported Cases and Operative Technique.Case reports in urology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Mitomycin gel for the pyelocaliceal system (UGN-101) is an approved kidney-sparing therapy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Little to no data exist on its safety and efficacy in patients with a history of urinary diversion. We report our experience with overcoming the anatomical challenges of UGN-101 instillation in patients with UTUC and prior history of radical cystectomy with urinary diversion. Materials and Methods: Retrospective review was performed on all patients with pre-existing urinary diversion who underwent UGN-101 instillation for management of UTUC at a single academic institution. Surgical techniques for instillation are described, and the clinical course, including complications and disease status, are reported. Results: Two patients met inclusion criteria. One patient had carcinoma in situ in the renal pelvis and was treated with antegrade instillation via nephrostomy tube at an infusion clinic. The second patient had multifocal disease in the renal pelvis and the distal ureter and was treated with targeted antegrade instillation using an end-hole catheter. Both patients experienced infectious complications, and one had a ureteral stricture that resolved without intervention. No diversion-related complications were observed. Both patients are disease-free at last follow-up (10 months) on endoscopy and biopsy, although one patient required systemic immunotherapy. Conclusions: Our series highlights the potential role of UGN-101 in patients with UTUC and pre-existing urinary diversion. Antegrade instillation of UGN-101 can be tailored to specific disease locations and should be considered for patients with a history of urinary diversion who are not candidates for extirpative surgery.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.