ArticleBMJ neurology open2026
Comprehensive evaluation of telehealth outpatient stroke service in rural and remote Australia: a multicentre study protocol.
Article in BMJ neurology open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Without guideline-based secondary management, ~10%-20% of stroke patients suffer a recurrent event within 12 months. Access to stroke specialists in rural areas is scarce, which may limit appropriate secondary prevention interventions and potentially explain the worse stroke outcomes shown in rural areas. We developed a hybrid model telestroke clinic (stroke specialist remotely by video and stroke coordinator face-to-face) at four rural hospitals in Australia. The aims were to determine the effect on recurrent cerebrovascular events, patient acceptability and cost for the hybrid clinic compared with previous usual care. We hypothesise that patients assessed through the clinic would have a decreased rate of recurrent cerebrovascular events at 12 months compared with those patients managed through standard pathways. Methods and analysis: This is a retrospective, multicentre (four sites) observational service evaluation study, comparing a hybrid telestroke outpatient clinic model of care with standard care. Ethics and dissemination: Ethics approval for the hybrid telestroke clinic data was obtained from the Hunter New England Human Research Ethics Committee (2021/ETH00452). Ethics approval for the control population was obtained from the Hunter New England Human Research Ethics Committee (HNEHREC Reference No. 13/02/20/5.06) with further amendment (AU201712-15). Trial registration number: ACTRN12625000447459. Registration date 13/5/2025.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.