Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41948075›Full record

ArticleOpen mind : discoveries in cognitive science2026

A Resource-Rational Account of Human Eye Movements During Immersive Visual Search.

Angela Radulescu, Bas van Opheusden, Frederick Callaway, Thomas L Griffiths, James M Hillis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Motor "laziness" constrains fixation selection in real-world tasks.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  3. Naturalistic reinforcement learning.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Angela RadulescuCenter for Computational Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2274-4265
Bas van OpheusdenOpenAI.
Frederick CallawayDepartment of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7687-5987
Thomas L GriffithsDepartments of Psychology and Computer Science, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.
James M HillisMeta.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The nature of eye movements during visual search has been widely studied in cognitive science. Virtual reality (VR) paradigms are an opportunity to test whether computational models of search can predict naturalistic search behavior. However, existing ideal observer models are constrained by strong assumptions about the structure of the world, rendering them impractical for modeling the complexity of environments which can be studied in VR. To address these limitations, we modeled immersive visual search as a reinforcement learning problem, in which sequential decisions are made over a multidimensional representation of the environment learned by a convolutional neural network. In our formulation, RL agents learned a policy over latent states-effectively solving what is known as a meta-Markov decision process (meta-MDP), where each decision concerns how to allocate attention to information in the environment. Training deep-RL agents on the meta-MDP showed that learned (i.e., optimal) search policies converge to a classic ideal-observer model of search developed for simple (1D) stimuli. We compared the learned resource-rational policy with human gaze data from a visual-search experiment conducted in VR and found qualitative and quantitative alignment between model predictions and human behavior. However, both the model's simulated performance and its correspondence with human behavior depended strongly on the representational features available to the policy. These results suggest that naturalistic visual search behavior can partially be explained by resource-rational allocation of limited cognitive resources, and the choice of representation influences the degree of alignment between model and human behavior.

Indexed as

deep reinforcement learningresource rationalityvirtual realityvisual search

Identifiers

PMID41948075
PMCPMC13053022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.