ArticleOpen mind : discoveries in cognitive science2026
Detection, Inspection, Return: An Object-Based Classification and Metric of Fixations in Complex Scenes.
Article in Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Objects guide human gaze behavior in dynamic real-world scenes.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Analyses of human gaze behaviour towards complex scenes typically aim to explain heatmaps or scan-paths. While heatmaps lack temporal information, scan-paths aim for a level of detail which often is impractical. We introduce a novel approach, based on the premise that most fixations target objects and do so in meaningfully different ways, depending on temporal context: Detection fixations (D) foveate an object for the first time; Inspection fixations (I) successively target object details; and Return fixations (R) revisit a previously fixated object after going elsewhere. To test the hypothesis that these classes capture distinct fixation profiles, we reanalysed a large dataset of scene fixations. We computed separate heatmaps for D, I, and R and found significantly higher inter-observer consistency within than between classes. Across fixations landing on different semantic features, the proportion of D, I, and R fixations varied consistently, and a semantic salience model trained to predict each type of fixations independently learned diverging distributions of feature weights. Further, we found a shift from D to I and R across viewing time, in line with previous findings on ambient and focal viewing modes. We tested and confirmed that the dynamics of this shift varied as a function of trial duration. Finally, we highlight the recent application of the D, I, R classification as a metric for gaze comparisons in the context of dynamic scenes, in which scan-path similarity metrics fail. We propose the D, I, and R classification as a computationally simple yet powerful tool to classify spatiotemporal aspects of scene fixations in an object-based and intuitive manner and provide well-documented code to implement it. Future research may explore potential functional differences between D, I, and R fixations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.