ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Emerging sports as public health infrastructure: policy transfer lessons from US pickleball to China.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Population-level physical inactivity remains a persistent public health challenge, yet many low-threshold activity innovations fail to achieve institutional integration within health and sports governance systems. Emerging sports often diffuse rapidly through grassroots participation without coordinated governance, standardized participation metrics, or aligned facility planning. This institutional gap limits sustained preventative health impact. Using pickleball as a comparative policy case, this study analyzed how governance mechanisms enabled scalable integration in the United States and assessed their transferability within China's state-led system. Using national participation reports, policy documents, and secondary literature, the analysis identified four defining features of the US model: association-led governance with formal monitoring, a dual-track facility strategy combining retrofitting with selective new construction, community-embedded participation across age cohorts and social settings, and a multi-level competition system linked to the health, tourism, and education sectors. By contrast, diffusion in China is constrained by the absence of unified governance, lack of participation and facility data, insufficient spatial provisions, low public awareness, and weak cross-sector coordination. Based on these contrasts, the study proposes a localization framework that prioritizes phased institutionalization, data-driven planning, low-cost spatial adaptation, educational and community embedding, and incremental integration into public health and tourism programs. The findings suggest that international experience is transferable when functional mechanisms, rather than institutional forms, are adapted to domestic governance conditions. The study provides policy-relevant guidance for incorporating emerging sports into China's national fitness and population-health strategies, with implications for other emerging sports in state-led governance systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.