ArticleFrontiers in surgery2026
Laparoscopic vs. laparotomy tubal recanalization for fertility restoration after tubal sterilization: a retrospective analysis.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To compare the therapeutic effects of laparoscopic recanalization and laparotomy recanalization on tubal patency restoration after tubal sterilization. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 122 patients who underwent tubal sterilization surgery at one tertiary grade A hospital from May 2013 to May 2023 were retrospectively analyzed.. The patients were divided into the laparoscopic group ( Results: The laparoscopic group had a higher recanalization rate, shorter postoperative ambulation, first flatus recovery, and hospital stay times, lower 12-hour pain scores, and less intraoperative blood loss (all Conclusion: Laparoscopic recanalization for patients after tubal sterilization is associated with less intraoperative blood loss, faster postoperative recovery, and higher recanalization and intrauterine pregnancy rates compared with open abdominal recanalization. Age and reconstructed tubal length are critical predictors of pregnancy success, highlighting their importance in preoperative assessment and surgical planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.