Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41947988›Full record

ArticleBreeding science2025

Learning from wild

Ken Naito, Fanmiao Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breeding science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Salinity stress tolerance inFrontiers in plant science · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ken NaitoResearch Center of Genetic Resources, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization, 2-1-2 Kannondai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8602, Japan.
Fanmiao WangResearch Center of Genetic Resources, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization, 2-1-2 Kannondai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8602, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Salt tolerance has been an important issue in agriculture. Many genes involved in salt stress have been identified, but this knowledge has not led to development of a salt-tolerant crop that are practically useful. Despite hundreds of transgenic plants have been tested, there are few examples that demonstrated yield performance that are practically applicable to salt-affected fields. It is therefore important to figure out which genes should be targeted for artificial manipulation. However, given there are >500 of genes involved, it is almost impossible to test all the possible combinations of genes and expression profiles even in model plants. In contrast, wild plants inhabiting coastal environments have acquired salt tolerance, often by enhancing the mechanisms that are also conserved in model plants. Elucidating the mechanisms and underlying genes in such wild plants should provide a clear guidance to the combinations of appropriate genes. The genus

Indexed as

genetic control mechanismssalt toleranceVignawild crop relatives

Identifiers

PMID41947988
PMCPMC13051636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.