Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41947978›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2026

Postoperative Neutrophil-to-Albumin Ratio as a Prognostic Marker for Patients with Bladder Cancer Undergoing Radical Cystectomy: A Retrospective Observational Cohort Study.

Wei Li, Chenhui Xiang, Guoping Xie, Yuanyuan Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of general medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Wei Li *Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
Chenhui Xiang *Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
Guoping XieDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
Yuanyuan ZhangDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, Xindu District People's Hospital of Chengdu, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0009-7303-0570

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of the postoperative neutrophil-to-albumin ratio (NAR) in patients with bladder cancer undergoing radical cystectomy. Patients and Methods: A total of 368 patients with histologically confirmed bladder cancer who underwent radical cystectomy between January 2018 and December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Postoperative NAR was calculated using neutrophil count (%) and serum albumin concentration (g/L) measured approximately three months after surgery. Receiver operating characteristic analysis identified the optimal NAR cutoff value for predicting 5-year overall survival. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression models were used to assess associations between NAR and overall survival or recurrence-free survival. Results: The optimal NAR cutoff value was 2.6 with an AUC value of 0.76. Elevated NAR was significantly correlated with bladder cancer of invasive pathological types (p = 0.005), advanced tumor stage (p Conclusion: An increased postoperative NAR independently predicts poorer overall and recurrence-free survival of bladder cancer patients following radical cystectomy. As an inexpensive and readily available biomarker reflecting systemic inflammation and nutritional status, NAR may serve as a practical tool for postoperative risk stratification and individualized patient management.

Indexed as

bladder cancerneutrophil-to-albumin ratioradical cystectomysystemic inflammation

Identifiers

PMID41947978
PMCPMC13050981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.