Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41947962›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

Unlocking potential in underachieving learners: self-regulation development through AI-supported e-mentoring among socioeconomically disadvantaged students.

Yan Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Yan ZhaoSchool of Biomedical Sciences, Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Underachieving students from socioeconomically disadvantaged backgrounds often experience difficulty sustaining self-regulated learning (SRL), which contributes to persistent gaps in participation and academic achievement. This study evaluated a three-tiered AI-supported e-mentoring intervention designed to strengthen SRL through goal clarification, micro-strategy prompting, reflective coaching, and growth-oriented maintenance support. In a cluster randomized controlled trial with pre-intervention, post-intervention, and short follow-up assessments, students in the AI-supported mentoring condition showed greater gains than controls in SRL, with improvements observed in both scale-based SRL indicators and platform-based behavioral markers (e.g., planning and task completion). These gains were accompanied by better academic performance, learning engagement, and persistence. Mechanism-oriented analyses further suggested that SRL operated as a proximal pathway linking the mentoring intervention to broader learning-related outcomes. Equity-focused moderation analyses indicated a compensatory pattern, with larger benefits among students with lower baseline self-regulation and greater socioeconomic constraints. Follow-up estimates suggested that effects were largely maintained after the intensive phase, although a modest attenuation was observed. Robustness checks and missing-data diagnostics supported the stability of the findings across alternative specifications. Overall, the findings suggest that AI-supported e-mentoring, implemented with teacher oversight and safety protocols, can support SRL development and promote more sustained engagement and achievement among underachieving learners.

Indexed as

AI-supported e-mentoringlearning engagementself-regulated learningsocioeconomic disadvantageunderachieving students

Identifiers

PMID41947962
PMCPMC13050934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.