Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41947956›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

Effects of Chinese proficiency and illustration types on Chinese reading comprehension among international students: evidence from eye-tracking.

Qingshan Qiu, Siqin Yin, Wenjie Huang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Qingshan QiuSchool of Chinese Language and Literature, Hubei University, Wuhan, China.
Siqin YinSchool of Chinese Language and Literature, Hubei University, Wuhan, China.
Wenjie HuangSchool of Management, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This research investigates how Chinese proficiency and different types of illustrations affect international students reading comprehension of Chines science and Technology text. Eye tracking technology will be used to clarify the cognitive process involved. Methods: We conducted a mixed-factorial eye-tracking experiment with a 2 (Chinese proficiency: high vs. low) × 4 (illustration type: representational, explanatory, organizational, transformational) design. We used a Tobii Pro Glasses 2 eye-tracker to record eye movement data, specifically total text-image fixation time, illustration area fixation duration, and fixation count. To analyze the effect of proficiency, illustration type, and their interaction, we applied a Linear Mixed Model (LMM), treating proficiency and illustration type as fixed factors and individual differences as random effects. Results: The results revealed a significant interaction between Chinese proficiency and illustration type on comprehension scores [ Conclusion: This study confirms a proficiency-illustration matching mechanism in Science and Technology Chinese reading. Key findings indicate that: (1) high-proficiency learners benefit most from explanatory and organizational illustrations, while low-proficiency learners rely on representational illustrations to reduce cognitive load; (2) transformational illustrations pose higher processing demands for low-proficiency learners, reflected in prolonged fixation durations; and (3) eye-movement patterns reveal distinct, proficiency-dependent processing strategies. The results underscore the need for aligning illustration types with learners' Chinese proficiency to optimize comprehension and cognitive efficiency in academic second-language contexts.

Indexed as

Chinese as a foreign languagecognitive loadeye-trackingillustration comprehensionsecond language reading

Identifiers

PMID41947956
PMCPMC13051398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.