ArticleFrontiers in sports and active living2026
Interaction of target distance and movement type on lower limb kinematics in fencing.
Article in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Coordination abilities and movement organization during the fencing lunge in youth foil fencers: an exploratory biomechanical study.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Since the distance between opponents constantly changes during fencing bouts, clarifying the relationship between movement type and target distance is important for understanding tactical movement selection. Methods: Twelve skilled male foil fencers performed lunges under six conditions combining three target distances (Short, Normal, Long) and two movement types (lunge without advance: LWOA; lunge with advance: LWA). Three-dimensional motion capture (500 Hz) was used to measure hip, knee, and ankle joint angles of the front and rear legs and center of mass (CoM) velocity. For each condition, the trial with the maximum horizontal peak CoM velocity was selected for analysis using a two-factor repeated-measures ANOVA. Results: Peak CoM velocity increased linearly with target distance and was consistently higher in LWA than in LWOA. The velocity difference between movement types was greatest at the Short distance and decreased at the Long distance. Correspondingly, rear-leg joint kinematics increased with target distance and were consistently larger in LWA than in LWOA, with significant interaction effects. Discussion: These findings suggest that the effectiveness of attack movements in fencing depends on the interaction between target distance and movement type. Fencers should select LWOA or LWA according to tactical distance while emphasizing rear-leg flexion and extension movements during training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.