ReviewJB & JS open access
Exploring the Orthopaedic Surgery Match: An Analysis of Trends in Applicant Characteristics After the Introduction of a Pass/Fail USMLE Step 1 Examination.
Review in JB & JS open access. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Orthopaedic Surgery remains one of the most competitive medical specialties to successfully match into. Historically, the United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 score was a major determinant of match success. Since its conversion to pass/fail status in January 2022, uncertainty has emerged regarding how programs mentor and advise applicants. The purpose of this study was to examine the changes in Orthopaedic Surgery applicant characteristics before the transition from a scored examination (2017-2022) to a pass/fail examination (2023-2025). Methods: The authors accessed the Texas Seeking Transparency in Application to Residency survey database, which contains survey information from graduating medical students nationwide regarding residency application characteristics. Characteristics of matched versus unmatched applicants between 2017 to 2022 and 2023 to 2025 were compared. Results: A total of 1,652 Orthopaedic Surgery applicants responded to the survey from 2017 to 2025 (data collected in May 2025). Since the incorporation of a pass/fail Step 1, Step 2 scores and research productivity has increased, volunteerism has decreased, and other academic metrics have remained unchanged. Conclusions: Applicants demonstrated shifts in characteristics without a corresponding change in match rates. From 2023 to 2025, applicants bolstered Step 2 performance and research output as primary differentiators in the absence of a numerical Step 1 score. Traditional academic markers such as class rank, clerkship performance, and Alpha Omega Alpha membership remained stable, while volunteer and leadership involvement declined moderately over the same period. These findings provide evidence-based guidance for navigating the Orthopaedic Surgery selection process in the postnumerical Step 1 era.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.