ArticleArchives of internal medicine research2026
Overview of Primary Angiitis of the Central Nervous System: Current Insights.
Article in Archives of internal medicine research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Door-to-Needle Optimization in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Review of Rapid Emergency Department Interventions.Cardiology and cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Timely Surgical Approaches for Pediatric Epilepsy Resistant to Medication.Journal of surgery and research · 2026Article
- Critical Assessment of Optimal Timing to Initiate Post-Stroke Rehabilitation.Archives of internal medicine research · 2026Article
- Limitations of Current Therapies and Barriers in Alzheimer's Disease.Archives of internal medicine research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Primary angiitis of the central nervous system (PACNS), also known as primary central nervous system vasculitis, is a rare autoimmune condition characterized by exclusive involvement of the brain, spinal cord, and leptomeninges. With an estimated prevalence of 2.4 cases per million person-years in North America, PACNS represents one of the rarest vasculitides and continues to pose significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenges due to its heterogeneous clinical manifestations and lack of specific biomarkers. This critical review article provides a comprehensive overview of PACNS with emphasis on: (i) current understanding of pathophysiology and unique variations of clinical presentation, (ii) challenges and strategies in reaching a definitive diagnosis, and (iii) evaluation and comparison of pharmacological and neuromodulatory therapies currently available. Recent advances in understanding pathophysiology have identified elevated interleukin-17 in cerebrospinal fluid, distinct gene expression profiles including upregulation of TBC1D3C and TBC1D3L genes, and immune cell profiling showing increased intrathecal NK-cell and B-cell frequencies. Three histopathological subtypes have been characterized: granulomatous vasculitis (32-61%), lymphocytic vasculitis (24-79%), and necrotizing vasculitis (14-42%). Emerging biomarkers including neurofilament light chain, circulating endothelial cells, and soluble triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2 (sTREM2) show promise for diagnosis and disease monitoring. Advanced neuroimaging modalities, particularly high-resolution vessel wall magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography, demonstrate utility in detecting vessel wall inflammation and guiding biopsy site selection. Treatment approaches include glucocorticoids combined with cyclophosphamide for induction therapy, with mycophenolate mofetil, rituximab, azathioprine, and methotrexate used for maintenance. TNF-α inhibitors have shown efficacy in refractory cases. Despite treatment, mortality ranges from 8-23%, and approximately 25% of patients experience severe disability. PACNS remains a diagnostically challenging condition requiring high clinical suspicion and comprehensive workup. Recent advances in understanding immunopathological mechanisms, identification of novel biomarkers, and development of advanced neuroimaging techniques offer promise for earlier diagnosis and more targeted therapeutic interventions. Brain biopsy remains the gold standard for diagnosis, though emerging non-invasive diagnostic modalities may reduce reliance on invasive procedures. Treatment strategies continue to evolve beyond traditional glucocorticoid and cyclophosphamide regimens, with biologics including rituximab and TNF-α inhibitors showing efficacy in refractory disease. Future multicenter collaborative studies are essential to validate emerging biomarkers, refine diagnostic criteria, establish evidence-based treatment protocols, and improve outcomes for this rare and heterogeneous disorder.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.