ArticlePalliative care and social practice2026
A caring safety net or a broken shelter-Relatives' experiences of specialized palliative home care: A national registry study.
Article in Palliative care and social practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cancer and circulatory diseases are overrepresented among the annual deaths in Sweden. Specialized palliative care (SPC) is considered complex, especially by cancer patients who have undergone long-term treatment. Relatives caring for a person with cancer within the home are faced with many demanding tasks. Purpose: To describe and map relatives' experiences of the end-of-life care given in specialized palliative home care from a Swedish national perspective. Methods: A register study was conducted with a mixed-method design using qualitative and quantitative descriptive data from relatives ( Findings: Two main themes were identified, with related themes and subthemes: "Home-a safe, dignified, and good place for dying" and "Home-a challenging, lonely, and unworthy place for dying." As a place of dying during SPC, home provided both security and challenging events. It offered security for the family and upheld their dignity with the presence and support of competent healthcare professionals (HCPs). Conversely, challenging events emphasized how the relatives were unprepared for their loved one's death and struggled to cope with the end-of-life situation. Some relatives felt that too much of the responsibility was left to them. However, the quantitative data showed that 99.1% of the relatives knew where to find urgent help during the last week of life, and the quantified qualitative data showed that HCPs were often available and supportive. Conclusion: Specialized palliative home care must strive to minimize challenging events that relatives experience during their loved one's end of life and reinforce protective factors such as the presence of HCPs. As the end-of-life period is challenging for families, adequate support and competencies must be secured. Otherwise, there is a risk of increased family suffering and relatives having difficulties with grief after the death.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.