ReviewPalliative care and social practice2026
Palliative and end-of-life care from an education lens. An international systematic review of undergraduate medical and nursing students' knowledge, perceptions, and orientation towards palliative and end-of-life care.
Review in Palliative care and social practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Nursing and medical schools and universities are increasingly integrating palliative and end-of-life care education in their curricula. However, research on the impacts of training and education on future nurses and physicians remains sparse. Aim of the review: The aim of this review was to systematically appraise existing research evidence on undergraduate nursing and medical students' knowledge, perception, and orientation towards palliative and end-of-life care. Methods: This international systematic review was conducted between April and May 2021 and was updated in May 2024. A systematic search was conducted in four databases: Hinari 'Research4Life', Cumulated Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Google scholar and PubMed. Methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Mixed-Methods Appraisal Tool. A data extraction sheet was developed for this review. A convergent integrated approach to mixed-method data synthesis and integration was used to analyse and report the evidence. Braun and Clarke's inductive and deductive thematic analysis approach was used to identify main themes. Results: A total of 64 peer-reviewed research articles met eligibility criteria and were included in the review. Of the 64 eligible research articles, 34 employed a descriptive quantitative cross-sectional design, 11 studies were qualitative, 14 used a quantitative non-randomised design and 5 were mixed methods. The review identified three major thematic categories: (1) students' knowledge of palliative and end-of-life care, (2) attitude, perception and orientation towards palliative and end-of-life care and (3) predictors of knowledge, orientation, attitude and perception towards palliative and end-of-life care. Conclusion: Findings suggest inadequacy and variability in knowledge levels, self-efficacy, willingness, perception and orientation towards palliative care and end-of-life care. Surprisingly, this is common across studies, including those from high-resource countries. Inadequate, limited and/or inconsistent curricula and training content about palliative and end-of-life care is a common theme in the literature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.