ArticlePalliative care and social practice2026
A descriptive study of cancer care experiences and burden of rural South Dakotans.
Article in Palliative care and social practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: American Indian (AI) persons with advanced cancer (PwAC) in South Dakota have seen increased rates of cancer incidence and mortality compared to national rates. These inequities are driven by social determinants of health. Providing early palliative care is highly important for rural PwAC but is sparsely available in rural South Dakota. Objective: To explore cancer care experiences and patient symptoms and caregiver burden among AI and rural PwAC, and their family caregivers (FCGs), to understand the barriers and opportunities for adapting an early palliative care intervention. Design: Descriptive study design reporting on the qualitative and quantitative data collected. Methods: PwAC and FCG participants were recruited from a rural healthcare facility delivering cancer care and serving AI tribal and rural/frontier populations. Quantitative data were collected using online surveys to discover symptoms and caregiving burden among PwAC ( Results: PwAC experience moderate symptom burden with 83.3% lacking energy, 77.8% feeling drowsy, and 72.2% feeling pain. FCGs experience high caregiver burden across all three subscales of the caregiving scale. Qualitative analysis found an overarching category of "Healthcare Fragmentation Amplified by Living in a Rural/Frontier Location" with three underlying codes: "Being Seen and Heard: Value-Based Connection to Distant Resources," "Facilitating Decision Making from Afar," and "Problem Solving Skills and Solutions." Conclusion: This study demonstrates that rural cancer care is challenged by multiple factors, including fragmented healthcare, lack of healthcare infrastructure, and vast travel distances. This greatly impacts PwAC and FCG's ability to feel seen and heard, make decisions, and problem-solve. Supportive programs designed for the local rural context are imperative to improve the quality of life for rural PwAC and their FCGs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.