ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2026
Impaired micro-online motor learning processes in individuals with severe anxiety.
Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anxiety is a prevalent emotional state with physiological and psychological manifestations that can disrupt cognitive processes, such as working memory and attention, leading to impaired motor performance and may also influence motor learning. This study investigated the effect of anxiety on implicit motor learning, visuospatial short-term and working memory, and perceived mental and physical effort. We collected data from 79 individuals using the serial reaction time task, the Corsi block-tapping test, and the NASA-Task Load Index. Participants were grouped based on their anxiety levels measured via the Beck Anxiety Inventory. All groups demonstrated intact implicit motor learning; however, learning processes differed between groups. The severe anxiety group exhibited learning after two-minute breaks between blocks (i.e., micro-offline learning), but did not demonstrate micro-online learning (i.e., improvements in performance while executing the task). In contrast, the minimal anxiety group exhibited both learning processes. Additionally, participants with severe anxiety reported greater frustration and feeling more rushed during the task compared to those with minimal anxiety. Furthermore, the severe anxiety group also demonstrated significantly lower working memory capacity compared to their short-term memory capacity. Together, these results suggest that while individuals with higher anxiety levels demonstrated intact implicit motor learning, they required greater cognitive resources for the learning to occur.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.