Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41947867›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2026

GABAergic and glutamatergic mechanisms of cortical excitability shape motor resonance during action observation as measured by transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Aynur Ragimova, Madina Imanaeva, Carlos Nieto-Doval, Alicia N Vorobiova, Victoria Moiseeva, Matteo Feurra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Aynur RagimovaCentre for Cognition and Decision Making, Institute for Cognitive Neuroscience, HSE University, Moscow, Russia.
Madina ImanaevaCentre for Cognition and Decision Making, Institute for Cognitive Neuroscience, HSE University, Moscow, Russia.
Carlos Nieto-DovalCentre for Cognition and Decision Making, Institute for Cognitive Neuroscience, HSE University, Moscow, Russia.
Alicia N VorobiovaDepartment of Psychology, HSE University, Moscow, Russia.
Victoria MoiseevaCentre for Cognition and Decision Making, Institute for Cognitive Neuroscience, HSE University, Moscow, Russia.
Matteo FeurraCentre for Cognition and Decision Making, Institute for Cognitive Neuroscience, HSE University, Moscow, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Motor resonance reflects the activation of the motor system during the observation of others' actions and is considered a physiological marker of the human mirror neuron system (MNS). This study investigated whether the excitatory and inhibitory balance in the primary motor cortex, driven by glutamatergic and GABAergic mechanisms, is linked to the strength of muscle-specific responses during action observation (AO). Objectives: To determine whether cortical excitation-inhibition balance relates to muscle-specific motor resonance during AO. Methods: Using single pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (spTMS), we measured motor evoked potentials (MEPs) from the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) and abductor digiti minimi (ADM) during an AO task involving videos of index and little finger movements. In addition, corticospinal excitability indices were assessed using single-pulse (SP), intracortical facilitation (ICF), and short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) protocols before and after AO. ICF reflects glutamatergic facilitation, while SICI indexes GABA-A mediated inhibition. Results: Across excitability protocols ICF consistently elicited the largest MEPs, followed by SP and SICI. After AO, MEPs increased in both ICF and SP protocols, whereas SICI showed reduced inhibitory effects. During AO, SP-induced MEPs in the FDI showed reduced corticospinal excitability during little finger movement observation, whereas ADM displayed increased excitability during neutral and little finger movement conditions. Correlation analyses indicated that both pre- and post-AO excitability measures correlated with task-related MEP modulation. Notably, higher post-AO ICF in ADM was associated with stronger ADM responses during observation of little finger movements. Greater pre-AO SICI in ADM was associated with stronger suppression of SP-induced ADM MEPs during observation of index finger movements. Additionally, FDI ICF, both before and after AO, correlated with SP-induced FDI MEP responses during index finger observation. Conclusion: Taken together, these results indicate that motor resonance arises from the interplay between excitatory and inhibitory processes in the motor cortex and that individual differences in motor resonance are constrained by stable excitatory-inhibitory properties indexed by ICF and SICI. These insights into cortical excitation-inhibition dynamics provide a neurophysiological basis for individualized interventions in neuropsychiatric and motor disorders characterized by disrupted motor resonance or corticospinal excitability.

Indexed as

action observationintracortical facilitationmirror neuron systemmotor cortex excitabilitymotor resonanceshort-interval intracortical inhibitiontranscranial magnetic stimulation

Identifiers

PMID41947867
PMCPMC13050837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.