ArticleEndocrine oncology (Bristol, England)2026
Therapy-related myeloid neoplasms following peptide receptor radionuclide therapy for neuroendocrine neoplasms: case series reporting characteristics and outcomes from single-centre experience.
Article in Endocrine oncology (Bristol, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE is increasingly used in the treatment of metastatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs). Marrow toxicity resulting in therapy-related myeloid neoplasms (t-MNs) remains a rare but fatal complication of PRRT, with a limited understanding of prognostic or predictive factors. Methods: We conducted a single-centre retrospective review of all patients with metastatic NEN who received at least one cycle of PRRT and subsequently developed t-MN confirmed on bone marrow biopsy. Results: Thirteen out of 306 patients (4.2%) developed t-MN during follow-up, confirmed on bone marrow biopsy. The median time from cycle 1 of PRRT to diagnosis of t-MN was 48.3 months (range: 5.4-110.1 months). The median number of PRRT cycles was 4 (range: 3-8). Nine (69%) patients received concomitant radiosensitising chemotherapy with capecitabine, and one (7.7%) had the combination of capecitabine and temozolomide. The median overall survival from cycle 1 of PRRT was 61.9 months (range: 18.5-112.2 months). The median overall survival from diagnosis of t-MN was 10.4 months (range: 1.9-89.3 months). An unfavourable karyotype, a higher degree of cytopaenia and a higher blast percentage in bone marrow were associated with worse survival outcomes of t-MN. Conclusions: t-MN following PRRT is an uncommon but serious complication that can occur several years after treatment. This case series highlights the poor prognosis following t-MN diagnosis, particularly if untreated. PRRT is an effective treatment modality for NEN, but prospective studies are needed to explore factors predictive of t-MN development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.