ArticleBJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology2026
Assessment of Perinatal Pelvic Floor Dysfunction Symptoms and Risk Factors: Measurement Properties of the International Consultation on Incontinence-Perinatal Pelvic Health Self-Assessment Questionnaire (ICIQ-PPHSAQ).
Article in BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Assessment of Perinatal Pelvic Floor Dysfunction Symptoms and Risk Factors: Measurement Properties of the International Consultation on Incontinence-Perinatal Pelvic Health Self-Assessment Questionnaire (ICIQ-PPHSAQ).BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo assess the measurement properties of the International Consultation on Incontinence-Perinatal Pelvic Health Self-Assessment Questionnaire (ICIQ-PPHSAQ) and to identify symptom subscales for scoring. DESIGN, SETTING AND POPULATION: Two cohorts of perinatal women (antenatal and postnatal) at nine NHS trusts in England completed ICIQ-PPHSAQ at baseline (16-19 weeks' gestation for the antenatal cohort and 6-9 weeks postnatal for the postnatal cohort) and at up to three further timepoints, with follow-up extending to 9 months postnatal.
methodsDescriptive analyses and exploratory factor analyses (EFAs) identified symptom subscales from which subscale scores were calculated. Internal consistency was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha (α). Test-retest reliability was assessed using an interval of 1 week after baseline, using weighted Kappa (κ) for individual ordinal items and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for subscale scores. Construct validity and known-groups validity were assessed by comparison with the Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S). Responsiveness was assessed by examining the mean differences between baseline and each timepoint.
resultsA total of 162 antenatal women who were 16-19 weeks gestation, and 173 women 6-9 weeks postnatal were recruited. Almost all the items performed acceptably in the test-retest analyses and completion rates were high in all the scored items (< 5% missing data). EFAs derived nine symptom subscales; seven of which had acceptable overall reliability indicators, except the vaginal symptom and vaginal changes subscales. Known-groups validity was demonstrated for all nine subscales, and six out of nine showed responsiveness to change (p < 0.05) over the study time-period.
conclusionThe study provides evidence supporting the validity and reliability of ICIQ-PPHSAQ, with responsiveness demonstrated across several domains. The instrument can be used to assess perinatal pelvic floor dysfunction risk factors and symptoms in English perinatal pelvic health services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.