Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41947744›Full record

ArticleNursing open2026

The Effect of Single and Double Shift Works on Salivary Cortisol Levels in Nurses.

Fadime Ulupınar, Sibel Meler, Engin Şebin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Fadime UlupınarErzurum Technical University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing, Erzurum, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8262-2908
Sibel MelerSelcuk University, Faculty of Medicine Hospital, Konya, Turkey.
Engin ŞebinDepartment of Medical Biochemistry, Erzurum City Hospital, Erzurum, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThis study aimed to elucidate the effects of single versus double-shift work schedules on salivary cortisol concentrations among nurses.

designThis research was designed as a comparative descriptive study utilizing repeated measures to assess changes over time and shift types.

methodsA total of fifty-two female nurses, working in rotating shifts, participated in the study. Saliva cortisol samples were collected from all participants before, after, and at midnight for both a single and a double shift. To assess interactions between time (07:30-08:30, 15:30-16:30, 23:00-24:00) and shift type (single and double), a repeated-measures two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used.

resultsAnalyses encompassing both time and shift type demonstrated significant main effects for both variables. Salivary cortisol concentrations were maximal between 07:30 and 08:30, while the trough levels were recorded at midnight. Inspection of the main effect associated with shift type revealed that double-shift workers exhibited higher mean cortisol concentrations. Specifically, cortisol levels were nearly two-fold higher at midnight in double-shift workers compared to single-shift workers. Additionally, a significant interaction effect between time and shift type was found.

conclusionThe pronounced effects of double shifts, as evidenced by significant changes in cortisol levels, warrant urgent consideration by healthcare policymakers and administrators, balancing operational efficiency with nurses' well-being and patient safety. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patient or public contribution.

Indexed as

HydrocortisoneNursesSalivaShift Work ScheduleWork Schedule ToleranceAdultFemaleHumansMiddle AgedHydrocortisonehealth risk managementmanagementmental healthnurse–patient interactionnursing assessmentprofessional regulationresearch in practicework organization

Identifiers

PMID41947744
PMCPMC13058568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.