ArticleJournal of veterinary science2026
Radiographic femoral measurements for sex and species classification in dogs and cats using machine learning.
Article in Journal of veterinary science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
importanceSex and species estimation from skeletal remains is important in veterinary forensic medicine, comparative anatomy, and zooarchaeology. Radiographic osteometry has been studied in dogs and cats, but machine-learning approaches have not been well evaluated for this purpose.
objectiveTo assess the performance of machine-learning models and a multilayer perceptron for estimating sex and species from radiographic femoral measurements in dogs and cats.
methodsThis retrospective study analyzed pelvic radiographs of 280 animals (140 dogs and 140 cats; 70 males and 70 females of each species) using 9 radiographic measurements. Random forest, decision tree, logistic regression, extra trees, linear discriminant analysis, quadratic discriminant analysis, and a multilayer perceptron were evaluated. Feature importance was explored with Shapley additive explanations.
resultsFor sex classification, the extra trees classifier showed the highest accuracy in both dogs (0.79) and cats (0.75). For species classification, logistic regression, quadratic discriminant analysis, and decision tree each achieved an accuracy of 0.89, whereas the multilayer perceptron reached 0.93 after 500 and 1,000 training cycles. The most influential variables were femoral length for sex classification in cats, left intercondylar fossa width for sex classification in dogs, and inter-femoral-head distance for species classification. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Radiographic femoral measurements permit moderate sex classification and high species classification in dogs and cats. These findings support the potential use of machine-learning analysis of femoral radiographs in veterinary forensic medicine and related morphometric fields.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.