ArticleTheScientificWorldJournal2026
The Mechanical Footprint of Dual Rinse 1-Hydroxyethane 1,1-Diphosphonate on Fast-Set Mineral Trioxide Aggregate Microhardness and Dislocation Resistance.
Article in TheScientificWorldJournal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Mechanical Footprint of Dual Rinse 1-Hydroxyethane 1,1-Diphosphonate on Fast-Set Mineral Trioxide Aggregate Microhardness and Dislocation Resistance.TheScientificWorldJournal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThis study evaluated the effects of various root canal irrigation protocols on the surface microhardness and push-out bond strength of a fast-set hydraulic calcium silicate-based cement at two different stages of hydration. MATERIALS AND
methodsStandardized 3-mm-thick root slices with uniform lumens were filled with RetroMTA (BioMTA, Seoul, Korea). The slices were randomly assigned to two setting intervals (1 or 14 days), after which their upper surfaces were irrigated using one of several protocols, including 2% NaOCl, 5.25% NaOCl, Dual Rinse HEDP mixed with either 2% or 5.25% NaOCl, 2% or 5.25% NaOCl followed by EDTA, or normal saline (as a control). The dislocation resistance of RetroMTA was then measured using the push-out bond strength test. For surface microhardness assessment, RetroMTA-filled polymethyl methacrylate molds were exposed to the same irrigation protocols, and their surface microhardness was measured using the Vickers microhardness test. The data were analyzed using one-way and three-way ANOVA tests.
resultsOne-way ANOVA showed that neither the 1-day nor the 14-day RetroMTA groups differed significantly from the control group in push-out bond strength or surface microhardness (p > 0.05). Three-way ANOVA demonstrated that no two-way or three-way interaction effects were statistically significant. Moreover, NaOCl concentration, chelator type, and the time interval between RetroMTA placement and irrigation had no significant effects on push-out bond strength or surface microhardness (p > 0.05).
conclusionUnder the limitations of this experimental study, no significant differences were detected among the effects of Dual Rinse HEDP mixed with either 2% or 5.25% NaOCl, NaOCl alone, or NaOCl followed by 17% EDTA on the push-out bond strength or surface microhardness of 1-day and 14-day RetroMTA samples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.