ArticleEuropean stroke journal2026
Early care limitation after ICH in a population-based study: what drives clinicians' decisions?
Article in European stroke journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionEarly care limitation (ECL) after ICH is increasingly recognised, but population-based data on time-dependent determinants remain scarce. We aimed to identify influencing factors of ECL within 72 h from admission and explore differences by sex, haematoma location and stroke-centre type. PATIENTS AND
methodsProspective population-based study of consecutively recruited adults with spontaneous ICH and pre-stroke mRS 0-3, admitted within the first 24 h to any hospital of the Catalan Stroke Network (HIC-CAT registry, 2020-2022). Early care limitation was recorded at 24 h (ECL-24 h) and 72 h (ECL-72 h). Candidate predictors were selected using all-subsets modelling for each time window. Model performance was assessed overall and in predefined subgroups.
resultsAmong 1821 patients, ECL-24 h was applied in 355 (19.5%) and an additional 102 had ECL by 72 h, yielding an overall ECL rate of 25.1%. Strongest predictors of ECL-24 h were age, prior anticoagulant use, baseline NIHSS, ICH volume and intraventricular haemorrhage (AUC 0.88). Predictors of ECL-72 h were age, prior anticoagulant use, pre-stroke mRS, baseline NIHSS and early neurological deterioration within 72 h (AUC 0.90). Across subgroups, AUCs ranged from 0.85 to 0.90, with lower performance in infratentorial ICH for ECL-72 h and in telestroke centres. Among ECL-24 h patients, 39 (11%) achieved 3-month favourable functional outcome, whereas no patients with ECL-72 h achieved this outcome.
conclusionEarly care limitation after ICH is frequent and its determinants differ by timing. In our study, very early decisions rely mainly on the static severity at admission, whereas later decisions incorporate neurological deterioration and appear to better align with prognosis. These findings support deferring ECL decisions until clinical evolution can be observed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.