ArticleJournal of anatomy2026
Post-hatching development of the remote-tactile bill-tip organ in precocial shorebirds (Scolopacidae).
Article in Journal of anatomy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Several groups of birds that rely on tactile foraging methods to locate prey exhibit specialized bill-tip organs to sense tactile cues. Most scolopacid shorebirds (sandpipers and kin) employ the sensory capability of remote-touch during foraging, allowing them to locate buried prey at a distance from their bills by detecting vibrational cues in the substrates they probe in. This is facilitated by a bill-tip organ made up of dense clusters of mechanoreceptors housed within a constellation of neurovascular foramina in the bone at the tips of their bills. Bill-tip organ morphology has been shown to correlate with foraging ecology; however, all previous research has focused on adult birds. Many tactile foraging birds, including scolopacids, have precocial young that forage independently within hours of hatching, yet remote-touch foraging and its morphological correlates in juvenile birds remain unexplored. Here, we use μCT scans to describe the morphology of the bill tips of juvenile-adult pairs of several scolopacid species to characterize the post-hatching development of the bill-tip organ. We show that the osteological correlates of functional bill-tip organs are present in juvenile scolopacids and describe changes in bill-tip organ morphology during post-hatching development. Our results suggest that juvenile scolopacids, and likely other precocial tactile foraging birds, are able to sense tactile cues with their bills from the point of hatching. Our data additionally suggest that previously described interspecific variation in bill-tip organ morphology associated with taxon-specific foraging behaviours and habitat preferences appears to develop after fledging and dispersal in scolopacids. These data reveal ontogenetic and interspecific differences in scolopacid bill-tip organ morphology associated with differing ecologies and improve our understanding of foraging behaviour of juvenile shorebirds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.