Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41947325›Full record

ArticleAnnals of work exposures and health2026

Occupational exposure of goat farm workers to particulate matter and endotoxin.

Aniek Lotterman, Ifeoluwa Olufotebi, Inge M Wouters, Albert Winkel, Lidwien A M Smit, Myrna M T de Rooij

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of work exposures and health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Aniek LottermanInstitute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Utrecht University, PO Box 80178, 3508 TD Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3079-2734
Ifeoluwa OlufotebiInstitute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Utrecht University, PO Box 80178, 3508 TD Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Inge M WoutersInstitute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Utrecht University, PO Box 80178, 3508 TD Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7834-9390
Albert WinkelWageningen Livestock Research, Wageningen University & Research, PO Box 338, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Lidwien A M SmitInstitute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Utrecht University, PO Box 80178, 3508 TD Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0292-0946
Myrna M T de RooijInstitute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Utrecht University, PO Box 80178, 3508 TD Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6560-4839

Funding

Ministry of HealthNature and Food Quality of the NetherlandsWelfare and Sport and the Ministry of Agriculture
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIntensive livestock farming exposes workers to elevated levels of particulate matter (PM) and endotoxins, increasing respiratory health risks. Although personal exposure has occasionally been investigated in the 3 major livestock sectors-cattle, pigs, and poultry-emerging sectors such as intensive goat farming remain understudied. This study aimed to quantify personal exposure to inhalable dust, PM10, and endotoxins among workers on Dutch dairy goat farms and to explore associations between exposure levels, specific work tasks, and farm characteristics.

methodsRepeated personal air sampling was conducted among 41 participants working at 15 goat farms. Inhalable dust and PM10 samples were collected using filter-based methods attached to portable air pumps. For all inhalable dust and PM10 samples, PM mass concentrations were determined by gravimetrical analyses and endotoxin concentrations with the Limulus-Amebocyte-Lysate assay. Determinants of exposure levels were analyzed by linear mixed modeling.

resultsInhalable dust concentrations showed a median of 0.966 mg/m3 (range: 0.228 to 3.093), with a median endotoxin concentration of 612 EU/m3 (range: 48 to 7,818). For the PM10 concentrations, a median of 0.376 mg/m3 (range: 0.070 to 1.233) was observed, with a median endotoxin concentration of 700 EU/m3 (range: 8 to 2,886). In total, 90% of the samples exceeded recommended occupational exposure limits for endotoxin (>90 EU/m3). PM10 and inhalable dust concentrations were strongly correlated (Pearson r = 0.71), as were endotoxin concentrations in both fractions (Pearson r = 0.71). Exposure to PM and endotoxin varied significantly between farms, within farms and within workers. Overall, highest exposures were recorded for workers with milking as a primary job task. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionsGoat farm workers are exposed to substantial levels of PM and endotoxins during routine work activities. On average, concentrations exceeded those reported for dairy cattle farm workers, yet remained lower than levels typically observed in pig and poultry farming. The observed considerable variation in exposure both between farms and among individual workers necessitates future research and more detailed microbiological characterization of air samples on determinants of exposure, to guide appropriate measures in husbandry and practices at goat farms. This research highlights that in emerging intensive livestock farming sectors, increased exposure to PM and endotoxins-and related health effects-can be expected among workers unless reduction of these exposures is explicitly addressed in the development of agricultural policies and practices.

Indexed as

Air Pollutants, OccupationalAnimal HusbandryEndotoxinsFarmersOccupational ExposureParticulate MatterAdultAnimalsDustEnvironmental MonitoringFarmsFemaleGoatsHumansInhalation ExposureMaleAir Pollutants, OccupationalDustEndotoxinsParticulate Matterbioaerosolsexposure assessmentintensive livestock farmingoccupational healthrespiratory health

Identifiers

PMID41947325
PMCPMC13056540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.