ReviewDiagnostic and prognostic research2026
Protocol for the development and validation of a risk score to predict risk of adverse events associated with systemic anti-cancer treatment in late-stage lung cancer: Lung Cancer Improved Decisions (LUCID).
Review in Diagnostic and prognostic research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLess than 20% of patients diagnosed with advanced lung cancer will survive beyond five years and half of these will suffer a serious adverse event (SAE) caused by systemic anticancer therapy (SACT) that will result in a hospital attendance. As multiple different SACT treatments are available for patients, a risk score that predicts the likelihood of a SAE following each type of SACT treatment would improve both communication with the patient and shared decision making with all those involved in delivering care for patients. There are currently no risk scores available for use in those with advanced stage lung cancer.
aimThe overarching aim of this research is to develop and internally validate a risk score that will calculate the individualised risk of SAEs for different SACT treatments for patients with late stage lung cancer.
methodsUtilising linked cancer registry data (National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service (NCRAS), England) for over 20,000 late stage lung cancer patients, a risk score will be developed using a multivariable logistic regression model to predict the risk of an acute admission within 30 days of SACT administration. Model performance will be summarised using calibration and discrimination. Internal validation will be used to quantify the degree of optimism due to overfitting, using re-sampling bootstrapping. Heterogeneity will be assessed, and the model will be fine-tuned. Fine-tuning and interrogation will be used to evaluate differences in performance between hospitals. The clinical utility will be assessed through calculating the net benefit in preventing SAEs.
conclusionA developed risk score (under each treatment strategy) has real potential to support individualised treatment decisions and optimise management of SACT-induced SAEs for patients and reduce hospital attendances.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.