Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41947255›Full record

ArticleMicrobiome2026

Toward ethical human microbiome research: improving health through radical interdisciplinary and intercultural co-laboration.

Wim Van Daele, Raul Yhossef Tito Tadeo, Jennifer Perera, Tshokey Tshokey, Per Ole Iversen, Saroj Jayasinghe, Roberta Raffaetà, Neyzang Wangmo, Heidi E Fjeld, Sonam Chhoden R and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiome, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Wim Van DaeleDepartment of Nutrition and Public Health, University of Agder, PO Box 422, 4604, Kristiansand, Norway. wim.van.daele@uia.no.
Raul Yhossef Tito Tadeo *Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Rega Institute, KULeuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Jennifer PereraDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, University of Colombo, No.25, Kynsey Road, Colombo - 08, Sri Lanka.
Tshokey TshokeyDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Jigme Dorji Wangchuck National Referral Hospital, PO Box No. 128, Thimphu, Bhutan.
Per Ole IversenDepartment of Nutrition, University of Oslo, PO Box 1046, 0317, Oslo, Norway.
Saroj JayasingheDepartment of Clinical Medicine, University of Colombo, Colombo - 08, Sri Lanka.
Roberta RaffaetàDepartment of Philosophy and Cultural Heritage, Ca'Foscari University of Venice, Venice, Italy.
Neyzang WangmoThe Medical Education Centre for Research Innovation and Training (MECRIT), Khesar Gyalpo University of Medical Sciences Bhutan, Menkhang Lam 3, Thimphu, Bhutan.
Heidi E FjeldDepartment of Community Medicine and Global Health, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, P.O box 1130, 0318, Oslo, Norway.
Sonam Chhoden RFaculty of Undergraduate Medicine, Khesar Gyalpo University of Medical Sciences of Bhutan, Menkhang Lam 3, Thimphu, Bhutan.
Tharanga ThoradeniyaDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo, No.25, Kynsey Road, Colombo-08, Sri Lanka.
Jeroen Raes *Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Rega Institute, KULeuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Funding

European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme GA n. 949742 ERC-HealthXCrossFonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek grant G0B7320NNorwegian Research Council Project no. 324158
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As human microbiome research is globalizing, it raises ethical concerns regarding the European and North American dominance in the field, which may reproduce a colonial bias and perpetuate inequities in global health research and outcomes. We suggest disentangling this ethical quandary into three main concerns: 1) scientific bias toward European and North American populations; 2) limited meaningful community inclusion, participation, and ownership, and 3) scant significant inclusion of diverse global researchers. We then formulate three recommendations for their resolution, deploying co-laboration-joint labor of diverse partners in generating synergies between diverse disciplines, cultures, and knowledges around shared concerns-and co-laborative science-a form of citizen science based on such synergies between diverse partners-to guide meaningful inclusive, participatory, and ethical human microbiome research. To conclude, we promote a programmatic list for putting co-laborative ethical science into practice, benefiting global communities, individuals, and researchers alike and decolonizing and improving health worldwide.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaEuropeGlobal HealthHumansNorth AmericaCo-laborationCo-laborative scienceDecolonizationEthicsGlobal healthInclusivityInterculturalityMicrobiomeRadical interdisciplinarity

Identifiers

PMID41947255
PMCPMC13054978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.