Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41947227›Full record

ArticleJournal of translational medicine2026

Interpretative diagnostic model for neuroblastoma metastases using bone marrow cytology.

Juan Ma, Qiang Yao, Xiaoying Fu, Zhouqi Xia, Yaoting Yue, Dongqing Xu, Xiaojun Yuan, Liebin Zhao, Jinhu Wang, Ao Dong and 5 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06703944 (Bone Marrow Cytology-based Artificial Intelligence Model for Detection and Prognosis of Neuroblastoma), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06703944 enrolling by invitationnot on this map

Bone Marrow Cytology-based Artificial Intelligence Model for Detection and Prognosis of Neuroblastoma

TypeobservationalSponsorXinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of MedicineRan2024 to 2026Enrolled500ConditionsNeuroblastoma (NB), Prognosis, Bone Marrow Metastasis, Bone MetastasesArmsrisk model in diagnosis and prognosis
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Juan MaDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Xin Hua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200092, China.
Qiang YaoDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Shenzhen Children's Hospital, Affiliated to Shantou University Medical College, Shenzhen, 518038, China.
Xiaoying FuDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Shenzhen Children's Hospital, Affiliated to Shantou University Medical College, Shenzhen, 518038, China.
Zhouqi XiaNational Clinical Trial Institute, Children's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Children and Adolescents' Health and Diseases, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310052, China.
Yaoting YueSchool of Communication and Information Engineering, Shanghai University, Shanghai, 200444, China.
Dongqing XuDepartment of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Xin Hua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200092, China.
Xiaojun YuanDepartment of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Xin Hua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200092, China.
Liebin ZhaoXinhua Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200092, China.
Jinhu WangPediatric Cancer Research Center, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Children and Adolescents' Health and Diseases, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310052, China.
Ao DongDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Children's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Children and Adolescents' Health and Diseases, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310052, China.
Limei GaoDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Xin Hua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200092, China.
Junyao YangDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Xin Hua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200092, China.
Lisong Shen *Department of Laboratory Medicine, Xin Hua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200092, China. lisongshen@hotmail.com.
Yingxia Zheng *Department of Laboratory Medicine, Xin Hua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200092, China. zhengyingxia@xinhuamed.com.cn.
Shaoqing Ni *National Clinical Trial Institute, Children's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Children and Adolescents' Health and Diseases, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310052, China. chgcp@zju.edu.cn.

Funding

Key Technologies Research and Development Program 2023YFC2706100National Natural Science Foundation of China 82373971Science and Technology Innovation Plan Of Shanghai Science and Technology Commission 21ZR1441500
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBone marrow (BM) is the most common site of metastatic disease at diagnosis and a frequent site of relapse in neuroblastoma. Digital cytology images of BM smears offer a rich data source for artificial intelligence models, which may potentially facilitate more cost-effective risk stratification within the diagnostic workflow. This study aims to develop an interpretable cytology model for detecting BM metastasis in pediatric neuroblastoma.

methodsThis retrospective diagnostic study used Wright-Giemsa–stained BM cytology images from 359 neuroblastoma patients who underwent BM screening between January 2019 and June 2024 across multiple centers in China. After the quality evaluation, we generated 1384,007 patches from BM digital cytology to develop and validate the cytology model. In the model construction, we integrated a multiple-instance learning framework with convolutional neural networks to extract cytology features, referred to as cMIL. The cytology model was trained for BM metastasis detection and risk stratification with interpretability.

resultsFor metastasis detection, the cytology model achieved an AUC of 0.924 (95% CI, 0.775–1.000) in the training cohort. Performance remained strong in external validation, with AUCs of 0.826 (95% CI, 0.741–0.911) in Cohort A and 0.795 (95% CI, 0.684–0.906) in Cohort B, indicating consistent performance across independent multicenter cohorts. The cMIL score also successfully stratified patients in terms of survival outcomes (log-rank p < 0.05). Interpretability analyses further demonstrated that the model’s predictions were associated with clinically relevant cytological features.

conclusionsIn this retrospective diagnostic study, the developed cytology model demonstrated high discriminative performance in detecting BM metastasis and captured the underlying complexity and heterogeneity of BM. These findings suggest that the cytology model could serve as a promising tool for improving metastasis detection and risk stratification in patients with neuroblastoma, potentially contributing to personalized treatment strategies and enhanced disease monitoring.

trial registrationThis retrospective study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06703944) on November 21, 2024. Study title: bone marrow cytology-based artificial intelligence model for detection and prognosis of neuroblastoma. ( https://register.clinicaltrials.gov ).

Indexed as

Bone MarrowBone Marrow NeoplasmsCytodiagnosisNeuroblastomaChildChild, PreschoolConvolutional Neural NetworksFemaleHumansInfantMaleMultiple-Instance Learning AlgorithmsNeoplasm MetastasisRetrospective StudiesArtificial intelligenceBone marrowCytologyMetastasisNeuroblastomaRisk stratification

Identifiers

PMID41947227
PMCPMC13188757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.