Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41947168›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2026

Thalidomide memorial activity: pedagogies of creativity, joy and immersion in medical education.

Anuradha Joshi, Dhruv Prajapati, Kuldeepsinh Parmar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anuradha JoshiParul Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Parul University, Vadodara, Gujarat, India. anuradha.joshi26620@paruluniversity.ac.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5389-785X
Dhruv PrajapatiParul Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Parul University, Vadodara, Gujarat, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-4936-9656
Kuldeepsinh ParmarParul Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Parul University, Vadodara, Gujarat, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-7518-6122

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough medical education has advanced rapidly over the past few decades, literature reveals lack of interest and curiosity of students in medical classrooms. Considering this, one of the major prerequisites in medical education is to, encourage the use of creative and novel pedagogies in medical curriculum.

methodsAn educational intervention study with a post-test only design was conducted at a medical school in Western India. The study involved 150 second-year MBBS students and utilized a student-centric “Thalidomide Memorial” activity. The intervention included the creation of multimodal physical and digital exhibits—such as plaques, 3D models, posters, collages, short films, and narratives—to teach drug safety and pharmacovigilance. Data were collected from 125 participants (83.3% response rate) using a validated feedback questionnaire (Kirkpatrick Level1) and a post-event knowledge test (Kirkpatrick Level 2).

resultsOn the basis of Kirkpatrick’s model level 1, student perceptions on the making of Thalidomide Memorial (Based on a 5-point Likert scale) revealed “Excellent” to very good ratings for most of the components i.e. Narratives (83.8%), Poster making (82.7%), History and Timeline of events (80.8%), Trigger film (80.8%), Newspaper clippings (80.8%), Clinical trial models (79.8%), Drug alert Posters (76.9%), and Thalidomide memorial plaques (75%). Kirkpatrick’s model level 2 evaluation on a 10-item post-event knowledge test indicated that the mean scores were 8.14 out of 10 with a median score of 8.0. Analysis of the individual scores exhibits that 94 students (75.2%) scored 8 or higher on the test. Analysis yielded an Odds Ratio (OR) of 6.41, indicating that students who rated the activity as “Excellent” were over six times more likely to be “Good Performers” (score 8–10) than those who rated it lower. Moreover, Cramer’s value denoted a moderate relationship between student performance and feedback for the overall event.

conclusionThus, this study demonstrates the first 2 levels of Kirkpatrick’s model displaying the perceptions and occurrence of learning and knowledge acquisition. This study also demonstrates the effective application of Universal Design for Learning (UDL) principles—Engagement, Representation, and Expression—in medical education. Overall this creative approach helped students identify and understand key elements of drug safety and ethical issues in an interesting way. In addition, it helped build empathy and critical thinking. Creative teaching-learning methods being the need of hour, can transform medical education, making complex topics more relatable and engaging for medical learners.

Indexed as

CreativityEducation, Medical, UndergraduateStudents, MedicalThalidomideCurriculumFemaleHumansIndiaMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesTeachingThalidomideCreativityMedical educationPedagogiesThalidomideUniversal design for learning (UDL)

Identifiers

PMID41947168
PMCPMC13220365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.