ArticleJournal of neuroinflammation2026
Integrative imaging and transcriptomics implicate neutrophils in microvascular no-reflow after stroke.
Article in Journal of neuroinflammation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIschemic stroke is a leading cause of adult disability and death, yet recanalization therapies that reopen occluded large arteries benefit only a subset of patients. Stroke patients can experience poor outcomes due to recanalization failure or the no-reflow phenomenon, where inflammation and microvascular obstructions prevent effective reperfusion despite successful large-vessel reopening. We hypothesized that failure of collateral and microcirculatory flow is a critical factor underlying the incongruity between large-vessel recanalization and effective tissue reperfusion. Neutrophils, as early responders to ischemic injury, are prime mediators of microvascular dysfunction. To test this, we investigated whether targeted depletion of neutrophils could preserve microvascular flow, improve perfusion, and attenuate inflammatory responses in stroke. MAIN BODY: Using a mouse model of middle cerebral artery occlusion, we applied a double-antibody depletion strategy to achieve efficient and specific removal of circulating neutrophils. This multi-modal study integrated high-resolution intravital imaging of cerebral blood flow and cellular dynamics, cytokine assays, transcriptomic profiling, and infarct size measurements. Neutrophil depletion preserved cortical perfusion (~ 30% vs. ~ 60% reduction in untreated mice), reduced capillary stalls, and nearly doubled early post-reperfusion capillary flow (red blood cell flux ~ 72% vs. ~ 33%). Infarct volumes were modestly reduced, with the most pronounced benefit in aged and female cohorts. Transcriptomic profiling revealed broad suppression of neutrophil-driven inflammatory programs (including Il1b, Mmp8, Lcn2, Tlr2, and Cd14), while protective homeostatic signals (such as Mef2c) were maintained and delayed pro-inflammatory activation (Itgam, Txnip, Tlr13) was prevented. Cytokine assays supported a dampened systemic inflammatory response following neutrophil depletion.
conclusionsThese findings identify neutrophils as central drivers of microvascular failure in acute stroke and support their therapeutic targeting to enhance reperfusion and limit inflammation. The use of a double-antibody depletion strategy underscores both the mechanistic importance of neutrophils and the translational potential of precise immune-modulatory interventions. Our multi-modal approach provides comprehensive insight into immune-vascular interactions after stroke and highlights a translationally relevant strategy for improving outcomes following recanalization therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.