ArticleBMC oral health2026
Evaluating the reliability and educational quality of YouTube™ and TikTok™ videos on custom subperiosteal implants: a cross-sectional methodological analysis.
Article in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Assessing the quality of general anesthesia-related short videos on TikTok: a cross-sectional study.BMC anesthesiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSocial media platforms such as YouTube™ and TikTok™ have become increasingly influential sources of oral health information. However, the reliability and educational value of videos on advanced surgical procedures, including custom subperiosteal implants, remain uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the quality, accuracy, and educational usefulness of YouTube™ and TikTok™ videos related to custom subperiosteal implant procedures.
methodsThis cross-sectional methodological study analyzed 38 videos (YouTube = 23, TikTok = 15) identified using English and Turkish keywords. Eligible videos were assessed independently by two calibrated reviewers using the Global Quality Scale (GQS), DISCERN, Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria, and the Video Information and Quality Index (VIQI). A seven-domain content rubric specific to subperiosteal implant education was also applied. Descriptive statistics, Spearman correlation, and Kruskal–Wallis tests were conducted. Interrater agreement was evaluated using Weighted Kappa for GQS and DISCERN, and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) for VIQI, JAMA, and total scores.
resultsOverall video quality was moderate, with mean scores of GQS = 2.66 ± 1.43, DISCERN = 32.71 ± 21.66, JAMA = 1.70 ± 0.54, and VIQI = 10.83 ± 4.90. Strong positive correlations were observed among GQS and DISCERN (r = 0.933, p < 0.001), GQS and VIQI (r = 0.942, p < 0.001), and DISCERN and VIQI (r = 0.949, p < 0.001), indicating substantial concordance among validated quality instruments. In contrast, total views demonstrated a strong negative correlation with JAMA scores (r = -0.748, p < 0.001), and likes were negatively correlated with JAMA (r = -0.822, p < 0.001), suggesting that higher viewer engagement was not associated with greater transparency or reliability. Interrater agreement was excellent across all tools (ICC > 0.79). No statistically significant differences were observed among uploader categories (p > 0.05), although videos uploaded by academic institutions and dentists demonstrated descriptively higher quality scores.
conclusionsYouTube™ and TikTok™ videos related to custom subperiosteal implants demonstrate moderate reliability and educational value, with substantial variability in content completeness. Video popularity did not reflect scientific accuracy. These findings should be interpreted in light of the limited sample size, the non-validated nature of the topic-specific rubric, and inherent differences between social media platforms. High-quality, evidence-based audiovisual resources created by dentists and academic institutions are needed to support patient education and informed decision-making.
trial registrationNot applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.