Trial reportBMC complementary medicine and therapies2026
Longer-term chiropractic care outcomes for US active-duty military personnel with low back pain: secondary analysis of a pragmatic clinical trial.
Trial report in BMC complementary medicine and therapies, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01692275 (Assessment of Chiropractic Treatment for Low Back Pain and Smoking Cessation in Military Active Duty Personnel), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Assessment of Chiropractic Treatment for Low Back Pain and Smoking Cessation in Military Active Duty Personnel
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFew trials have directly evaluated outcomes of adding chiropractic care to usual medical care, and prior work has been limited to short-term follow-up. The objective of this work is to address these gaps by evaluating outcomes from the addition of chiropractic care to usual medical care in active-duty U.S. military members with low back pain (LBP) over 52 weeks.
methodsA multi-site, pragmatic clinical trial allocated 750 U.S. active-duty military personnel with LBP to usual medical care plus chiropractic care or usual medical care alone with the primary endpoint at 12 weeks. The final 154 participants enrolled in the study were asked to provide longer-term follow-up data. We used inverse probability weighting to account for missing outcome data and analyzed data using linear mixed-effects regression models over all follow-up time points. We report between-group mean differences at 12 and 52 weeks adjusted by baseline age, sex, site, pain duration, worst pain intensity, and interaction terms for site differences by group over time. Primary outcomes were disability (Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire: RMDQ) and pain intensity (NRS). Secondary outcomes were PROMIS-29: pain interference, physical function, fatigue, sleep disturbance, and social role.
resultsA total of 144 participants provided outcome data after 12 weeks. Overall, the mean participant age was 33 years, 113 (78%) were male, 54 (38%) were non-white race, 18 (13%) were Hispanic or Latino ethnicity, and 71 (49%) had chronic LBP. At 12 weeks, moderate between-group difference in RMDQ (2.2 points, 95% CI 0.4 to 4.0) favored chiropractic care with small difference in NRS (0.6, -0.1 to 1.2). At 52 weeks, RMDQ difference was small (1.7, -0.2 to 3.7) and NRS difference was negligible (0.2, -0.5 to 1.0). Improvement in PROMIS domains varied, with many diminishing over the course of follow-up; sleep disturbance demonstrated the greatest longer-term difference in improvement at 52 weeks (3.6, 0.5 to 6.7).
conclusionsAdding chiropractic care to usual medical care for active-duty U.S. military members with low back pain resulted in a small difference in pain-related disability and a meaningful difference in sleep disturbance but not pain intensity at 52 weeks. Differences in pain interference, physical function, and social role estimates also favored the addition of chiropractic care over the longer-term follow-up.
trial registrationThis trial was first posted for registration on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01692275) on 09/06/12.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.