SynthesisBMC psychiatry2026
Digital phenotyping and digital monitoring technologies for relapse detection in mental health: a systematic review.
Synthesis in BMC psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Digital phenotyping for predicting relapse in psychiatric disorders: a systematic review of passive sensing approaches.BMC psychiatry · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMental health relapse remains a major challenge in the long-term management of psychiatric disorders. Conventional monitoring approaches rely primarily on periodic clinical assessments and self-report measures, which may fail to capture early behavioural changes preceding symptom deterioration. Digital phenotyping, which refers to the continuous collection and analysis of behavioural and physiological data from personal digital devices has emerged as a promising approach for monitoring mental health trajectories and identifying early warning signals of relapse. However, the evidence base remains fragmented, with significant variability in methodologies, populations, and outcome measures, limiting clear conclusions.
objectiveThis systematic review synthesises the current evidence on digital phenotyping and related digital monitoring approaches used to detect, predict, or prevent relapse in individuals living with mental health conditions.
methodsThe review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA 2020) guidelines and was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024561513). A comprehensive literature search was conducted on 17 December 2024 across multiple databases, namely PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, IEEE Xplore, CINAHL, ACM Digital Library, and Google Scholar. Eligible studies should have examined digital phenotyping or digital monitoring technologies in the context of relapse detection, prediction, or prevention in mental health conditions. Both experimental and observational study designs were included, encompassing randomised and cluster trials, along with pilot, feasibility, and observational monitoring studies. Data were extracted on study characteristics, digital technologies, monitoring modalities, and relapse-related outcomes. Risk of bias for randomised controlled trials was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias (RoB) 2 tool.
resultsTwenty-two studies involving approximately 12,000 participants met the inclusion criteria. Most studies were conducted in high-income countries and evaluated a diverse range of digital monitoring technologies, including smartphone applications, wearable sensing devices, SMS-based interventions, and predictive algorithms. Across studies, digital monitoring technologies demonstrated the potential to identify behavioural signals associated with worsening mental health symptoms and early relapse risk, particularly through smartphone-based monitoring and digital therapeutic platforms. However, the evidence base remains heterogeneous, with many studies focused on feasibility or pilot evaluations rather than validated relapse prediction systems. SMS-based interventions and app-based cognitive behavioural therapy tools generally reported positive findings, whereas wearable devices and predictive algorithm approaches showed mixed findings.
conclusionDigital phenotyping and related digital monitoring approaches show promise for improving relapse monitoring and early detection in mental health care. However, the current evidence base remains heterogeneous. Future research should prioritise larger longitudinal studies, standardised relapse definitions, and multimodal monitoring approaches integrating behavioural, physiological, and clinical data to improve the reliability and clinical applicability of digital phenotyping technologies. PROSPERO REGISTRATION: CRD42024561513.
trial registrationNot applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.