Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41947063›Full record

ArticleBMC medical imaging2026

Multimodal radiomics for early prediction of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: integration of amide proton transfer weighted imaging in radiomics.

Mingzhe Xu, Ailing Wang, Dongqiu Shan, Xuejun Chen, Renzhi Zhang, Chunmiao Xu, Junhui Yuan, Jing Li, Guangguang An, Zhiwei Shen and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Mingzhe Xu *Department of Radiology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, 450000, China.
Ailing Wang *Shanghai Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance, Institute of Magnetic Resonance and Molecular Imaging in Medicine, School of Physics and Electronic Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai, 200062, China.
Dongqiu ShanDepartment of Radiology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, 450000, China.
Xuejun ChenDepartment of Radiology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, 450000, China.
Renzhi ZhangNational Cancer Center, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, The Department of Radiology, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
Chunmiao XuDepartment of Radiology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, 450000, China.
Junhui YuanDepartment of Radiology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, 450000, China.
Jing LiDepartment of Radiology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, 450000, China.
Guangguang AnDepartment of Radiology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, 450000, China.
Zhiwei ShenPhilips Healthcare, Beijing, 100600, China.
Yue WuDepartment of Radiology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, 450000, China.
Funing ChuDepartment of Radiology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, 450000, China.
Guang YangShanghai Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance, Institute of Magnetic Resonance and Molecular Imaging in Medicine, School of Physics and Electronic Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai, 200062, China. gyang@phy.ecnu.edu.cn.
Jinrong QuDepartment of Radiology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, 450000, China. qjryq@126.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly prediction of pathological complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in breast cancer remains challenging. Traditional imaging lacks molecular sensitivity, while single-modality radiomics may miss tumor microenvironment dynamics. Integrating amide proton transfer-weighted imaging (APTWI)-quantifying protein levels linked to chemo-response-into multimodal radiomics may enable precise early pCR prediction, guiding personalized therapy. This study aims to develop and validate a multimodal radiomics model, integrating amide proton transfer-weighted imaging (APTWI), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and early-phase contrast-enhanced T1WI, for preoperative prediction of pathological complete response (pCR) in breast cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC).

methodsThis retrospective study included 109 women (mean age 50 ± 10 years) with untreated breast cancer between May 2023 and August 2024, underwent NAC and pretreatment MRI scanning, including APTWI, DWI, and dynamic contrast-enhanced T1WI. Three-dimensional tumor segmentation was performed using ITK-SNAP. Radiomics features were extracted from APT, ADC maps, and enhanced subtraction images (30s/90s) using PyRadiomics, adhering to IBSI guidelines. LASSO regression selected predictive features, followed by Support Vector Machine and Logistic Regression classifiers with five-fold cross-validation. Performance was evaluated via ROC analysis, calibration curves, decision curve analysis (DCA), and SHAP interpretability.

resultsPatients were randomly divided into training (n = 77) and testing (n = 32) cohorts. The integrated model combining clinical (e.g. HER2, Ki-67) and radiomics features achieved superior predictive performance (AUC = 0.888, 95% CI: 0.768-1.000) versus single-modality radiomics (ADC: AUC = 0.708), standalone clinical (AUC = 0.815), or radiomics models (AUC = 0.763). Calibration showed strong prediction-reality agreement (Brier score = 0.157). DCA confirmed clinical utility at 10%-65% thresholds. SHAP identified HER2 status and ADC-derived texture features (e.g. Cluster Shade) as top predictors.

conclusionMultimodal integration of APTWI, DWI, contrast-enhanced T1WI, and clinicopathological biomarkers enables accurate preoperative pCR prediction in breast cancer, supporting personalized NAC management. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Compared to single-modal imaging, our multimodal radiomics model provides more comprehensive biomarkers, thereby enabling personalized therapeutic decisions and optimizing NAC regimens to reduce overtreatment.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsNeoadjuvant TherapyPathologic Complete ResponseRadiomicsAdultBiomarkers, TumorFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMiddle AgedMultimodal ImagingRetrospective StudiesBiomarkers, TumorAmide proton transferBreast cancerMagnetic resonance imagingNeoadjuvant chemotherapyRadiomics

Identifiers

PMID41947063
PMCPMC13185318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.