ArticleBMC infectious diseases2026
Gap in knowledge and improvement after an infectious disease training program for Ugandan healthcare workers.
Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAchieving international accreditation standards, including those defined by the Joint Commission International (JCI), requires strong infection prevention and control (IPC) and antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programs to limit antimicrobial resistance. In Uganda, healthcare workers (HCWs) still face challenges in infectious disease (ID) management due to limited diagnostic resources, standardized protocols, and structured IPC training. This study aimed at assessing possible gaps in knowledge at baseline and short-term improvements after a context-adapted IPC and AMS training program in improving infectious disease management competencies among healthcare workers in Uganda.
methodsWe conducted a pre–post interventional study between July 21st, 2025, and July 30th, 2025 involving 56 healthcare workers (nurses, midwives, and clinical officers) from rural and peri-urban health facilities in Northern Uganda. The curriculum, which aligns with the World Health Organization, Ugandan Ministry of Health, and JCI standards, covered tuberculosis, HIV, malaria, sepsis, pneumonia, hepatitis, and emerging infections, as well as key IPC and AMS principles. Teaching combined interactive lectures, case-based discussions, and simulation exercises. Knowledge and practice were assessed before and after training using multiple-choice questions (MCQs), clinical case scenarios (CCSs), and Knowledge-Attitude-Practice (KAP) surveys. Paired t tests were used to compare pre- and post-training scores.
resultsThe 56 participants had a mean age of 34.5 ± 5.2 years and an average of 9.2 ± 4.6 years of professional experience. Post-training performance improved significantly across most thematic domains. The largest increases in the proportion of correct responses were observed in HIV/STI, malaria, viral hepatitis, and bone and joint infections. The mean MCQ score increased from 0.61 ± 0.12 to 0.85 ± 0.08 (p < 0.001), representing a 25% mean gain. CCS scores increased from 0.59 to 0.70 (p < 0.001). KAP-A scores rose from 0.90 to 1.03. Variability in performance decreased post-training, suggesting more uniform understanding. No significant correlation was found between improvement and participants’ age, sex, or education level. Qualitative feedback confirmed greater confidence and adherence to hand hygiene, PPE use, and environmental sanitation practices.
conclusionsThe program significantly improved both knowledge and IPC competences across all professional groups. Translating international standards into locally applicable practices strengthened frontline capacity of HCWs’ for infection prevention, clinical safety, and antimicrobial stewardship. Our study was limited to assess improvement at the conclusion of the intervention, therefore refresher sessions, mentorship, and integration with IPC monitoring tools are likely to be useful to sustain this level of knowledge and contribute to foster long-term health system resilience in Uganda.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.