Observational studyBMC emergency medicine2026
Determinants of ECG misdiagnosis of atrial fibrillation or flutter in the emergency department and their clinical implications: results from a single-center observational study.
Observational study in BMC emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAtrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial flutter (AFL) are common arrhythmias frequently misdiagnosed. The emergency department (ED), a fast-paced environment, presents challenges for accurate ECG interpretation. This study examined whether timing of ED presentation affects diagnostic accuracy.
methodsOver five years (2019–2024), consecutive ECGs from patients discharged with AF or AFL were independently reviewed by two cardiologists. Diagnoses were classified as correct, partially correct (AF misread as AFL or vice versa), or overinterpreted (non-AF/AFL rhythms misread as AF/AFL). Arrival times were grouped into morning (07:00–15:00), afternoon (15:00–23:00), and night (23:00–07:00) shifts. Multivariable logistic regression analyzed predictors of overinterpretation.
resultsAmong 2,003 patients (1,794 AF; 209 AFL), interpretations were correct in 1,780 (88.9%), partially correct in 166 (8.3%), and overinterpreted in 57 (2.8%). Overinterpretation rates were highest in the afternoon (4.3%) versus morning (2.8%) and night (0.7%) (p = 0.012). Independent predictors included afternoon arrival (OR 1.87; 95% CI 1.07–3.25; p = 0.027) and premature beats (OR 2.22; 95% CI 1.30–3.81; p < 0.001). Overinterpretation was independent of shift workload and physician experience, and resulted in inappropriate new prescriptions of rate-control agents (38.5%), antiarrhythmics (28%), and anticoagulants (56%), with minor and major bleeding occurring in 16% and 3.5% of cases, respectively. Diagnosis was revised during outpatient follow-up in only 5% of cases.
conclusionOverinterpretation of AF remains a concern in the ED. Error rates did not rise during nighttime shifts, implying that factors other than clinician fatigue may underlie these mistakes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.