ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2026
Genes shielded, repeats exposed: mutation bias in the midge Chironomus riparius.
Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Divergent Thermal Reaction Norms of the Spontaneous Mutation Rate Among Populations of Chironomus riparius.Molecular ecology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mutation is the fundamental source of genetic variation, yet growing evidence shows that mutations are not uniformly distributed across genomes but are shaped by genomic architecture, DNA repair dynamics, and environmental conditions. Here, we investigate fine-scale determinants of mutation distribution in the nonbiting midge Chironomus riparius, an ecologically important freshwater insect widely used in ecotoxicology. We integrated mutation data from 5 independent studies, including spontaneous mutation-accumulation experiments and multigenerational exposure assays involving cadmium, benzo[a]pyrene, tyre and road wear particles, and varying generational time. In total, we analyzed 420 single-nucleotide mutations mapped to the chromosome-scale C. riparius reference genome. Using a Bayesian modeling framework, we tested whether mutation density is (i) uniformly distributed, (ii) nonuniformly distributed, or predicted by (iii) distance to telomeres and centromeres, (iv) proximity to genes, or (v) distance to repetitive elements. Models were compared using a cross-validation method. We also quantified the proportion of mutations in exons and evaluated the synonymous vs nonsynonymous spectrum using BayesFactor in R. The best-supported model incorporated nonlinear effects of genomic position and distance to genes, identifying proximity to coding regions as the dominant predictor of mutation rate. Mutation density increased with distance from genes, indicating strong protection of genic regions. A model including repetitive elements showed nearly equivalent support, suggesting that functional and structural features jointly shape mutational landscapes. Only 9.8% of mutations occurred in exons despite exons representing 22.85% of callable sites, demonstrating a marked depletion of exonic mutations. Among exonic mutations, 70.7% were nonsynonymous-statistically indistinguishable from the neutral expectation (75%). These findings show that mutation processes in C. riparius are strongly structured by genome architecture, with implications for evolutionary genomics, ecotoxicology, and population-genetic inference.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.